Skip to main content
  • IETF@40

    Forty years ago today, 21 people gathered in San Diego, California for the first meeting of what became the Internet Engineering Task Force.

    16 Jan 2026
  • Launch of the IETF Community Survey 2025

    The IETF Community survey is our major annual survey of the whole of the IETF community and is used to inform the actions of IETF leadership throughout the year. The 2025 IETF Community Survey is live and we want to hear from you!

    23 Dec 2025
  • IETF Administration LLC 2026 Draft Budget

    The IETF Administration LLC has prepared its draft budget for 2026 and now seeks community feedback.

    19 Dec 2025
  • Net zero update for 2025

    As 2025 comes to a close, we want to provide an update on the IETF’s carbon footprint for this year and share information about further steps we took to increase IETF operations’ sustainability.

    17 Dec 2025
  • IETF 124 post-meeting survey

    The IETF 123 Madrid meeting was held 19-25 July 2025 and the results of the post-meeting survey are now available on a public report.

    11 Dec 2025

Filter by topic and date

Filter by topic and date

Strange but familiar in Dublin

21 Oct 2015

We’re both at ICANN 54 in Dublin, and of course a big topic is the IANA transition.

At this meeting most of the focus is on ICANN accountability changes. Those are important for us because the IANA stewardship transition plan for the names community depends on those accountability changes. People want to make sure that ICANN (the organization) complies with the community’s will. Since we think that’s what it means to be a bottom-up organization, it seems like a natural reform to us and one the ICANN community deserves.

There are disagreements about the specific ways to do this, and people also recognize the risk of accidentally creating new issues when making a change. The amount of progress we’ve seen during the meeting is impressive, however. The feelings here are at once familiar and strange — the exact ways people hammer out consensus in ICANN are not the way we do things in the IETF, but seeing hard positions start to converge is for sure something we understand. One thing we’re noticing is people embracing practical power that rests with the community rather than mere legal enforcement by courts. We think that’s positive for three reasons. First, it hands the power directly to the people who need it instead of giving them indirect means to achieve it. Second, it seems to represent lower risk to IANA: lengthy legal proceedings would be bad operationally. Finally, this mode of operation has always worked for the IETF.

We care about the overall stability of Internet systems and organizations, but a current big interest in this is due to the IANA transition. If the different operational communities can’t together make this transition happen, we’ll have to face bad options. We will lose some of the confidence people have in the Internet community. The transition was part of the promise at the foundation of ICANN, and the promise has come due.

We really appreciate the hard work people are doing on these accountability changes. We are very happy with the progress that has already been made this week. The key to completing this process is to focus on the practical ways to put the appropriate and sufficient power in the community hands.

(This post represents our personal opinions.)


Share this page